SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps, help put food on the table for nearly half a million Wisconsin children in families with low incomes. Efforts to restrict access to SNAP, such as the changes Governor Walker has proposed, could harm children by making it harder for families to make ends meet.SNAP provides a modest but important boost to many Wisconsin families with children. In 2013, 452,000 children across Wisconsin benefitted from SNAP – about 1 out of every 3 children in the state. In four counties – Milwaukee, Sawyer, Adams, and Burnett – more than half the children benefitted from SNAP at some point during the year.Governor Walker has said that he wants to make it harder to receive SNAP benefits, by requiring people to pass a drug test before they can receive assistance. We don’t have the details yet on what Governor Walker is proposing, but we do know that his plan would likely be cost inefficient and conflict with federal requirements Read more that bar wide-spread drug testing for SNAP recipients.
One in nine households in Wisconsin has difficulty affording food, according to a new report from the U.S Department of Agriculture. Read more
Nearly 12% of Wisconsin households did not have access to enough food for an active, healthy lifestyle over the period 2011 through 2013.That translates into about 270,000 Wisconsin families struggling to put food on the table. The share of Wisconsin households that have trouble affording food shot up during the recession and hasn’t come back down; a decade ago, only 9% of Wisconsin families lived in food insecurity. That’s the same pattern shown by many other measures of economic well-being for Wisconsin families. For example, poverty rates in Wisconsin also remain stubbornly high, and household income levels don’t show much signs of bouncing back to pre-recession levels either. As a result, many families are continuing to experience the same levels of hardship that they did during the recession – even though some of the temporary supports for families with low incomes that were introduced during the recession have since been eliminated.
Paul Ryan has a released a new poverty plan that advocates consolidating federal safety net programs and turning the money over to the states. It’s always worth taking a look at changes that could make anti-poverty program more effective, but Ryan’s approach would decrease opportunity for individuals living in poverty, not increase it.
Ryan frames his new proposal as aimed at giving low-income people the tools they need to make ends meet and lift themselves out of poverty. According to his proposal, Expanding Opportunity in America:
“A key tenet of the American Dream is that where you start off shouldn’t determine where you end up. If you work hard and play by the rules, you should get ahead. But the fact is, far too many people are stuck on the lower rungs…There are many factors beyond public policy that affect upward mobility. But public policy is still a factor, and government has a role to play in providing a safety net and expanding opportunity for all.”
Ryan believes that a fundamental redesign of how federal anti-poverty programs deliver services can help expand opportunity across the board. Read more
Fast food workers in Wisconsin are part of a national strike to rally for higher wages. Strikes took place in Milwaukee, Madison, Wausau, and other Wisconsin cities. Workers are advocating for a wage floor of $15 an hour.
Nearly 900,000 people in Wisconsin will see a cut in their food assistance benefits starting Friday, making it harder for many Wisconsin families to put food on the table, according to a new Wisconsin Budget Project report. Read more
The across-the-board cuts will reduce food assistance by $89 million in this fiscal year, when a boost to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, also known as food stamps), is set to expire.Wisconsin children will be especially hard hit by the cut, as 1 out of 3 Wisconsin children received SNAP benefits last year. In some areas of the state, such as Milwaukee and rural counties in northern Wisconsin, SNAP is such an important support for families that more than half the children receive assistance over the course of the year.In addition to helping feed hungry families, SNAP is one of the fastest, most effective ways to stimulate a struggling economy.
A Significant Economic Hit to the National Economy and a Gradually Expanding Erosion of Key Programs
Economists expect the federal government shutdown to have significant adverse consequences for the national economy. This LA Times article Read more reports that some project that even just a two-week partial shutdown will cause a reduction of 0.3 to 0.4 of a percentage point from national economic growth in the fourth quarter. That’s particularly a problem when the economic recovery is already so sluggish that job growth has been barely keeping ahead of population growth. I worry about those economic consequences, but I am also very concerned about the effects of the shutdown on children and families in our state – especially for low-income and vulnerable families. Fortunately, most federally funded programs for those families will continue at least through October, but the consequences could be very serious for vulnerable families if the shutdown lasts well into the fall.
Poverty Remains High, Median Income Remains Low, and Health Insurance Coverage Improves Modestly
Data released today by the U.S. Census Bureau reinforce the recent findings by economists that there is a very wide gap between the rich and the poor. The new Census figures for 2012 from the Current Population Survey (CPS) show that the painfully slow economic recovery has yet to help a large segment of Americans. Poverty remained high last year, at 15% nationally, and median income remained low — 8.3% below the 2007 level, before the Great Recession began. In a New York Times blog post Read more this afternoon, a graph prepared by Jared Bernstein uses the 2012 Census Bureau data to illustrate the diverging trend lines since 1967 in the household income of low, middle and upper income Americans. And as Bernstein notes, the divergence would be much wider if the Census Bureau didn’t exclude capital gains income from its data.
One in nine households in Wisconsin has difficulty providing food for all their members due to a lack of resources, according to a new report from the U.S Department of Agriculture. That rate is sharply up from a decade ago, when one in 12 Wisconsin households faced food insecurity. Read more
The chart below shows the percentage of Wisconsin households with food insecurity at different points over the last decade: 8.1% in 2000-02, 11.4% in 2007-09, and 11.2% in 2010-12.About one in 20 Wisconsin households face very low food security, a more severe form of food insecurity that means that the food intake of household members was reduced and normal eating patterns were reduced due to limited resources.Nationally, about one in seven households struggled with food insecurity in 2012, including one out of five households with children.One of the most effective tools we have to combat food insecurity is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as SNAP or food stamps.
More than 800,000 people in Wisconsin will see a cut in their food assistance benefits this fall, when a temporary boost to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps) is set to expire, according to new data released by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) discussed in a new report from the Washington, DC-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Read more
All of the more than 47 million Americans, including 22 million children, who receive SNAP, (also known as FoodShare in Wisconsin) will see their food assistance reduced, when a modest boost in benefits to SNAP recipients that policymakers included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) to strengthen the economy and ease hardship expires on October 31. For a family of three, that cut will mean a reduction of $29 a month— $319 for the remaining 11 months of the fiscal year. This is a serious loss for families whose benefits, after this cut, will average less than $1.40 per person per meal.
IRP Research Shows Antipoverty Programs Reduced Unofficial Poverty Rate in Wisconsin in 2010
A report released Wednesday Read more by the Institute for Research on Poverty (IRP) at UW Madison examines the effects of the antipoverty programs on the poverty rate in Wisconsin. Not surprisingly, the official measure of poverty shows an increase in Wisconsin between 2009 and 2010. However, the IRP’s alternative gauge of poverty (the “Wisconsin Poverty Measure” or WPM) showed a decrease in the poverty from 11.1% to 10.3%.Whereas the official poverty measure is based just on pre-tax cash income, the WPM uses a broader lens that also examines taxes, tax credits, and “near cash” income such as food stamps. Last year the IRP concluded that from 2008 to 2009 the alternative poverty measure was flat in Wisconsin, because the drop in families’ income was offset by tax credits and food assistance benefits, which were enhanced that year by the federal Recovery Act.