In Some Parts of Budget, JFC Shows Affinity for Federal Funding

Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 5:47 PM by

By Siphoning off More TANF Funding to Pay for the EITC, Committee Undercuts Arguments Against Using Federal Funds  Read more

The Joint Finance Committee votes Thursday, May 21, on a wide range of Medicaid issues, including whether to expand BadgerCare and save upwards of $345 million that could help prevent deep cuts in higher education and other parts of the budget. The most frequent argument made by conservatives against capturing that federal assistance is that we shouldn’t accept federal funding that might not be secure. However, if you were carefully watching the Finance Committee’s budget votes last Thursday you would have gotten a very different perspective on the willingness of the majority party to accept federal funding.  There were at least two times last Thursday when the JFC voted to amend the Governor’s budget in ways intended to capture or utilize more federal funding. In one case (motion #345) the committee unanimously approved new standards that will make it easier for the Department of Children and Families to close child support cases.

Welfare Reform Block Grant Funds Once Again at Risk in Wisconsin

Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 5:18 PM by

The Joint Finance Committee will vote Thursday on whether to divert more funds from the federal welfare reform block grant to help finance unrelated parts of the state budget.  The amount of those funds transferred to the Department of Revenue (DOR) has already been increased dramatically in each of the last two budgets.  $62.5 million per year from the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) block grant is being used to replace state funding for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), and that maneuver reduces the funding available for important programs to assist vulnerable low-income families.   

According to a Legislative Fiscal Bureau paper (#215) Read more , federal law would allow the state to transfer up to $12.3 million more to DOR in the next biennium, in order to back out state General Fund dollars for the EITC.Optimally, legislators should decrease the use of TANF funding for the EITC, which is what the Department of Children and Families (DCF) proposed last fall in the budget request they submitted to the Department of Administration. 

Proposed EITC Funding Shift Reveals another Budget Hole

Friday, October 10, 2014 at 4:50 PM by

TANF Funding Squeeze Creates a Substantial Budget Challenge 

The Department of Children and Families (DCF) budget proposes a very large cut in the portion of funding for the Earned Income Tax Credit that comes from the federal welfare reform block grant, which is known as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). Specifically, the department’s 2015-17 budget  Read more proposes cutting $55.8 million from the TANF funding that gets transferred to the Department of Revenue, which would mean that state General Purpose Revenue (GPR) has to fill the very substantial gap. Assuming the Walker Administration isn’t planning to cut the EITC, I applaud DCF for wanting to use state funds rather than TANF funds to finance that credit for low-income working families. Unfortunately, the Department of Revenue (DOR) budget proposal doesn’t currently include an increased GPR appropriation for the EITC. Taking both agency proposals together, we have a $55.8 million hole that needs to be filled by state policymakers, and that problem is on top of the other structural budget challenges that have gotten more media attention.  

Important Choices Tuesday on Funding for Welfare to Work and Child Care Programs

Monday, May 5, 2014 at 8:04 PM by

New Federal Money Provides Chance to Close Large Hole in W-2 and Improve Child Care 

Wisconsin got some good news from Washington over the last couple of months, in the form of supplemental federal funding for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and additional child care and development funds (CCDF).  The plans for using part of that additional funding – $19.8 million from TANF and $3.8 million from CCDF – will be reviewed by the Joint Finance Committee (JFC) on May 6th.  (The LFB paper can be found here.)I’ve written numerous times over the past year or so about the fact that the biennial budget bill made very unrealistic assumptions Read more about declining participation in the state’s welfare to work program, known as Wisconsin Works or W-2.  The budget bill cut the W-2 appropriation and siphoned off TANF block grant funding by using it to supplant state funds for the Earned Income Tax Credit. 

Taking Stock of the Earned Income Tax Credit on EITC Awareness Day

Friday, January 31, 2014 at 5:59 PM by

Despite Using Far More TANF Funds for the WI EITC, Total Spending Declines

Today is EITC Awareness Day, when the IRS works with community organizations, elected officials, state and local governments, schools, employers, and other interested parties to spotlight the Earned Income Tax Credit, and to encourage more eligible families and individuals to apply for the credit. The IRS estimates that one fifth of eligible taxpayers fail to claim and get this important credit. In recognition or EITC Awareness day, let’s take a look at the Wisconsin EITC, including some recently released data showing the declining value of that credit over the past years, and the role of that decline in adding to the state surplus.   It’s also a good time to consider the effectiveness of the EITC as a tool for helping make work pay for low-income families.    As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities pointed out in a January 31 paper Read more , the EITC helps working families make ends meet and encourages them to keep working and to work more hours. 

Categories: 2013-15 biennial budget, Blog, EITC, STATE TAXES, TANF | Comments Off

Legislature Approves Unfunded Transitional Jobs Bill

Tuesday, November 5, 2013 at 6:31 PM by

New LFB Paper Illustrates Why Tapping TANF Funding Appears Unlikely

The Assembly overwhelmingly approved a bill today that we strongly support, because it is aimed at expanding a program to provide on-the-job training to low-income people.  The only catch is that it isn’t funded, and the prospects for funding it don’t look promising anytime soon.   The bill in question is SB 333, which is part of the package of workforce training bills proposed by the Governor in late September.    It authorizes expansion of the Transitional Jobs program, which now only operates in Milwaukee.  Transitional Jobs was first implemented several years ago as a pilot program, with funding from the federal Recovery Act.   Although that came to an end, the 2013-15 biennial budget bill created a new version of it in Milwaukee, which is now called the Transform Milwaukee Jobs Program Read more .  It was allocated $9.9 million from the federal welfare reform block grant known as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF).   

Categories: Blog, ECONOMIC SECURITY, jobs, TANF, W-2 | Comments Off

DCF and DHS Plan Would Close Part of the W-2 Funding Shortfall

Friday, October 4, 2013 at 10:42 AM by

Since late spring we’ve been raising concerns that the biennial budget bill cuts funding for the welfare-to-work program known as Wisconsin Works (W-2) based on faulty assumptions.  This June 17 paper examines the problem and explains how reducing W-2 spending and shifting federal block grant funds made it easier to cut state taxes in the budget bill.

This week the Walker Administration acknowledged the W-2 shortfall and submitted a plan to the Joint Finance Committee (JFC) to narrow the funding gap by $9.6 million. The plan submitted to JFC by the Dept. of Children and Families (DCF) and Dept. of Health Services (DHS) closes part of the gap by using unallocated federal funding known as “income augmentation” revenues.  These funds are received by the state as the federal share of state and local spending for things like Targeted Case Management and the Medicaid HealthCheck program.The proposal Read more identifies a total of about $33.7 million of income augmentation funds, of which the biennial budget bill has already committed $19.6 million during fiscal year 2013-14.

The Effects of the Federal Government Shutdown for Wisconsin Children and Families

Tuesday, October 1, 2013 at 5:13 PM by

A Significant Economic Hit to the National Economy and a Gradually Expanding Erosion of Key Programs

Economists expect the federal government shutdown to have significant adverse consequences for the national economy.   This LA Times article Read more reports that some project that even just a two-week partial shutdown will cause a reduction of 0.3 to 0.4 of a percentage point from national economic growth in the fourth quarter.   That’s particularly a problem when the economic recovery is already so sluggish that job growth has been barely keeping ahead of population growth.  I worry about those economic consequences, but I am also very concerned about the effects of the shutdown on children and families in our state – especially for low-income and vulnerable families.  Fortunately, most federally funded programs for those families will continue at least through October, but the consequences could be very serious for vulnerable families if the shutdown lasts well into the fall.

Ten Reasons Why This a “Robin Hood in Reverse” Budget

Tuesday, August 6, 2013 at 9:58 AM by

In a long Q & A format interview in the Capital Times, I described a number of the faults of the 2013-15 budget bill. One of the defects I mentioned in that interview is that the bill employs a “Robin Hood in reverse” strategy for allocating resources. Because the article doesn’t provide much explanation of the reasoning behind that charge, I feel obligated to elaborate.

Actually, I think there is a very broad range of reasons for concluding that the recently enacted budget shifts resources from the poor to the rich. A new Wisconsin Budget Project paper explains ten of those reasons, which are summarized more succinctly below:1) Diverting federal block grant funds for low-income families Read more – The bill siphons off funding from the federal block grant known as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) and indirectly uses those funds to build up the state’s surplus, which helped lawmakers enact larger income tax cuts that primarily benefit the wealthy.

New Stats on W-2 Participation Contradict Rosy Assumptions in JFC Budget

Monday, June 17, 2013 at 5:51 PM by

Budget’s Diversion of Funding for Low-income Families Is Based on Faulty Assumptions

When legislators take floor votes this week, they will decide whether and how much to cut spending for the Wisconsin Works (W-2) program, which aids unemployed low-income families, and whether they divert the savings to use for things like tax cuts for the wealthy.  The arguments that state budget writers have used to support a W-2 cut are running up against some very inconvenient facts that contradict the Joint Finance Committee’s assumptions. As I’ve written on other occasions (such as this blog post Read more ), the budget bill’s cut in W-2 spending is part of a strategy that siphons off money intended for low-income families – in order to free up General Fund dollars to use for other purposes, such as the proposed income tax cut. The spending cut was based on the assumption that W-2 participation would decline steadily, beginning well before the start of the new biennium.