“Grading Places: What Do the Business Climate Rankings Really Tell Us?”

Wednesday, May 1, 2013 at 5:32 PM by

A careful analysis of the four most prominent “business climate” ratings of state tax systems finds them to be “deeply flawed and of no value to informing state policy.”  A report published today by Good Jobs First (“Grading Places: What Do the Business Climate Rankings Really Tell Us?”) concludes that business climate studies are actually “politicized grab-bags of data” that contradict each other wildly.

The “Grading Places” report is authored by Dr. Peter Fisher, an economist who has written extensively on economic development.  According to Dr. Fisher:

When we scrutinized the business climate methodologies, we found profound and elementary errors.  We found effects presented as causes.  We found factors that have no empirically proven relationship to economic growth.  And we found scores that ignore major differences among state tax systems.”

You can find the complete report and the executive summary here.

Jon Peacock

Categories: Blog, corporate tax, economic development, economy, JOBS & THE ECONOMY, STATE TAXES, taxes | Comments Off on “Grading Places: What Do the Business Climate Rankings Really Tell Us?”

Comments are closed.